Nation
    Next Score View the next score

    Newest justices show they don’t march in lock-step

    New on the high court: Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch (left) and Brett Kavanaugh.
    Doug Mills/New York Times via AP/Pool photo/File 2019
    New on the high court: Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch (left) and Brett Kavanaugh.

    WASHINGTON — President Trump’s two Supreme Court appointees were on opposite sides of two of three cases the justices decided Tuesday.

    The two new justices solidified conservative control of the Supreme Court, but they do not march in lockstep, at least in the small corners of the court’s work dealing with Indian treaties and maritime law.

    In one case, Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the court’s liberal justices in ruling that a Washington state Indian tribe doesn’t have to pay a state fuel tax. Gorsuch said an 1855 treaty makes a ‘‘handful of modest promises’’ to the Yakama Nation, including the right to move goods to market freely.

    Advertisement

    Holding the parties to the treaty that ceded 10 million acres to the United States ‘‘is the least we can do.’’

    Get Ground Game in your inbox:
    Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    Justice Brett Kavanaugh dissented, arguing the treaty merely gives tribal members the same right to travel as everyone else.

    The other case involved a lawsuit by survivors of two Navy veterans over their exposure to asbestos.

    Kavanaugh wrote the court’s opinion that allows the suit against manufacturers of equipment used on Navy ships to continue.

    Kavanaugh wrote that the makers of pumps, turbines, and blowers that required asbestos insulation to operate properly should have warned about the health dangers — even though the companies did not manufacture or sell the asbestos to the Navy.

    Advertisement

    Gorsuch dissented.

    The manufacturers ‘‘are at risk of being held responsible retrospectively for failing to warn about other people’s products,’’ Gorsuch wrote.

    The liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts also were in the majority. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas joined Gorsuch’s dissent.

    In the Indian treaty case, Gorsuch’s opinion was joined only by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, leader of the court’s liberal wing.

    The other three liberal justices voted for the same outcome, but with different reasoning.

    Advertisement

    Trump nominated Gorsuch to fill the seat Republicans held open for more than a year after Justice Antonin Scalia died in 2016. The Senate refused to act on President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland.

    Kavanaugh joined the court in October, after tumultuous hearings that included an allegation he had sexually assaulted a woman as a teen.