How releasing more mosquitoes might actually curb the number of mosquitoes

It turns out more mosquitoes might be a good thing.

The Environmental Protection Agency announced this month that it has approved a new method for reducing populations of disease-carrying mosquitoes in 20 states — including all of New England. And it involves releasing millions more of the irritating insects into our skies.

But don’t be alarmed: The new mosquitoes would all be males and because male mosquitoes don’t bite, they don’t spread diseases, experts say. Females do bite because they need the nutrients found in blood to help them develop their eggs, experts said.


Sure, winter is setting in, but this new form of mosquito control is good news if your summer is ruined by mosquitoes. But how would it work?

Get Fast Forward in your inbox:
Forget yesterday's news. Get what you need today in this early-morning email.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

The male mosquitoes, which are lab-raised and infected with a strain of a bacteria called Wolbachia, are released in an area where officials want to reduce populations, according to EPA officials as well as scientists at MosquitoMate Inc., the Kentucky-based company that developed the method.

When the male mosquitoes seek out females to mate with, the bacteria renders the females essentially sterile. Unable to reproduce, the mosquito population shrinks as adults die off within weeks.

Don’t worry about the bacterium either. It’s naturally occurring, common in most insects, and harmless to humans. Plus it doesn’t spread beyond the mosquitoes, officials said.

What’s more, MosquitoMate has already field tested the method with EPA oversight, officials say, and the results have been good, showing a 60 to 90 percent decline in mosquito populations with no discernible downside.


Independent experts said the method requires further data collection to ensure it can work on a large scale, but they said they were encouraged by how the new, low-risk technique has produced favorable results so far.

“I believe these strategies hold promise, yet they require more evaluation to understand their efficacy and risks,” said Laura C. Harrington, an entomology professor at Cornell University.

The EPA’s approval comes with a five-year limit and applies to using this method on only one particular species of mosquito, the Asian tiger mosquito, or Aedes albopictus. This type of mosquito is invasive to the United States — it didn’t exist here until the mid-1980s. It is known to be aggressive, bite during the daytime, and spread a host of diseases, including Zika, dengue, and Chikungunya, along with heartworm in dogs and cats.

Though the Aedes albopictus is not one of the more prevalent species in Massachusetts, it is still found here, particularly in the southeastern part of the state, experts said. And there’s a hope that the same method could be extended to later reduce other mosquito species, including those more common in Massachusetts.

But before any bacterium-infected male mosquitoes are released in Massachusetts or elsewhere, at least one potential hurdle remains: State officials will have to sign off on the use of the method.


In Massachusetts, that approval must go through the Department of Agricultural Resources. A spokeswoman for the department said officials there had not reviewed the plan for approval and did not give a timeframe for when that might happen.

But Richard Pollack, chairman of the Massachusetts Mosquito Advisory Group (which might be asked to weigh in on the approval process, but will not play a formal role), expressed doubt that approval would be timely.

“There would be many hurdles to clear, not the least being a certain amount of fear and anxiety by persons who don’t understand the technology at hand,” said Pollack, who is also a public health entomologist at Harvard and commissioner for the Norfolk County Mosquito Control District.

Stephen Dobson, chief executive of MosquitoMate and an entomology professor at the University of Kentucky, said he’s hopeful that the positive results from his company’s testing will help to persuade officials at the state level to give the plan a green light.

“We’ve been working with the EPA for several years now. We’re very pleased with the results, and we’re excited to move forward,” Dobson said.

“This will be effective in local suppression — in reducing the population in a local area,” added Jason L. Rasgon, a Penn State University entomology professor who has closely studied mosquitoes and the Wolbachia bacteria for two decades.

The plan is to use the method, in combination with other longstanding population control measures, as another way to help to reduce the insects’ numbers in certain areas.

“This is not a silver bullet,” said Harrington, the Cornell professor. “We will still need conventional mosquito control and integrated methods.”

The approach might have benefits over other methods.

For example, the method only affects mosquitoes, which makes it different from pesticides, which can be indiscriminate, killing butterflies and bees that help pollinate plants.

The concept of sterilizing mosquitoes and other insects to reduce their populations is not new. But previous methods of sterilization relied on zapping mosquitoes with radiation, which was inefficient.

Officials acknowledged they’re keeping a close eye on the process to ensure mosquitoes don’t become resistant to the bacterium involved.

Matt Rocheleau can be reached at Follow him on Twitter @mrochele.